Skip to main content

What We Do

February 15, 2023

CFTC Should Not Outsource the Protection of U.S. Markets and Taxpayers to Weaker Mexican Swap Laws and Rules That Are Not Comparable to U.S. Law

Better Markets filed a comment letter in response to a proposed comparability order from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on behalf of Non Bank Swap Dealers subject to Mexican government regulations.

Why It Matters. 

The stakes are incredibly high when it comes to ensuring the financial stability of the banks and nonbanks participating in the derivatives markets, as proved by the 2008 crash. Of particular relevance here, foreign financial firms, including foreign affiliates of U.S. financial firms like those here seeking Mexican regulators, were key actors during the financial crisis, engaging in high-risk and often socially useless activities, suffering existential instability, and ultimately requiring massive bailouts at the expense of U.S. taxpayers.

What We Said. 

The CFTC’s proposed order finds that the capital and financial reporting requirements for nonbank swap dealers domiciled in Mexico (which are affiliates of the largest Wall Street banks) are comparable to the capital and financial reporting requirements under U.S. law.  But the requirements are in fact not comparable.  To make this determination and claim to find comparability, the CFTC has proposed numerous, material conditions to compensate for the acknowledged significant gaps in the Mexican legal framework.

However, even with the imposed conditions, the proposed order does not provide sufficient analysis as to exactly how and why the CFTC concluded that the Mexican and American frameworks would produce ‘comparable outcomes.’  It relies too much on conclusionary statements that the two regimes are comparable without disclosing sufficient facts, data, or analysis to support such claims. Given the inherently difficult and predictive analysis of likely outcomes, a much more thorough explanation than that offered in the proposed order is required.

Bottom Line. 

We understand and appreciate that the CFTC has a long history of regulatory cooperation with the Mexican Commission. But a positive regulatory rapport with another country is no substitute for strong substantive regulation and oversight of the international and risk-laden swaps markets. The CFTC must fulfill its duty under the Dodd-Frank Act to protect the U.S. financial system and reject this proposed comparability determination.

Read our full Comment Letter here or click the button below.

Comment Letters
Share

Donate Today!

Contact Us

For media inquiries, please contact press@bettermarkets.org or 202-618-6433.

To sign up for our email newsletter, please visit this page.

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign Up — Stay Informed With Our Monthly Newsletter

"* (Required)" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

For media inquiries,

please contact press@bettermarkets.org or 202-618-6433.

Donate

Help us fight for the public interest in our financial markets, protecting Main Street from Wall Street and avoiding another costly financial collapse and economic crisis, by making a donation today.

Donate Today