Skip to main content

Analysis

March 30, 2012

Fallacies, Irrelevant Facts, and Myths in the Discussion of Capital Regulation: Why Bank Equity is Not Expensive

This 2011 study dismantles the myth that bank equity is expensive and entails significant social costs. The study contends that the arguments bank executives have put forward against holding more equity are often “fallacious, irrelevant, or very weak.” The authors argue that requiring banks to hold more equity will result in greater social benefits and in minimal costs.

The report was authored by Anat Admati, Peter DeMarzo, and Paul Pfleiderer of Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business and Martin Hellwig of Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods in Bonn, Germany.

Read the full report here 

Studies
Share

MEDIA REQUESTS

For media inquiries, please contact us at
press@bettermarkets.org or 202-618-6433.

Contact Us

For media inquiries, please contact press@bettermarkets.org or 202-618-6433.

To sign up for our email newsletter, please visit this page.

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign Up — Stay Informed With Our Monthly Newsletter

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

For media inquiries,

please contact press@bettermarkets.org or 202-618-6433.

Donate

Help us fight for the public interest in our financial markets, protecting Main Street from Wall Street and avoiding another costly financial collapse and economic crisis, by making a donation today.

Donate Today